The first patent case in the imaging accessories industry to complete litigation and enforcement offers a practical reference for rights holders

SHENZHEN, China, Oct. 8, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The High People's Court of Guangdong Province has issued a final, legally binding judgment in favor of Shenzhen Leqi Innovation Co., Ltd., the company behind SmallRig, in a design patent infringement case involving Shenzhen Neewer Technology Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Xing Ying Da Industry Co., Ltd. The court held that the accused products fall within the scope of protection of Leqi Innovation's design patent, dismissed Neewer Technology's appeal and affirmed the trial court's judgment in its entirety.

Under the judgment, the two defendant companies were ordered to cease manufacturing and selling the side handles at issue, destroy remaining inventory of the infringing products and related promotional materials, bear all court costs, and pay damages to Leqi Innovation. The damages awarded under the judgment have been paid in full.

The case is the first patent enforcement action in the imaging accessories industry to proceed through the entire judicial process, from evidence collection through trial, appeal and enforcement of the judgment, including full payment of damages. It provides a practical reference for companies seeking to enforce their patent rights in similar infringement cases.

Rapid growth in short-form video and livestreaming has increased demand for imaging accessories such as camera cages, side handles and cold shoe rails. Alongside that expansion, the market has seen a proliferation of products that closely resemble established designs in both appearance and construction. Some sellers copy other brands' product designs and structural features, making only minor changes to logos or colors before selling them at lower prices to gain market share through Chinese e-commerce channels and international marketplaces such as Amazon.

Tooling, contract manufacturing and online distribution are often handled by separate entities. This fragmented supply chain makes it harder for rights holders to trace products to their source, collect evidence and identify and pursue the responsible parties. Cases involving overseas platforms also require additional cross-border notarization procedures, increasing both the time and cost of enforcement.

Founded in 2010, Leqi Innovation launched SmallRig in 2013. The brand provides a full range of professional photography and filmmaking accessories to creators worldwide. Its portfolio includes camera and smartphone accessories, lighting and control equipment, power solutions, and microphones. 

The company continues to invest in research and development while building a comprehensive, multilayered strategy for patent protection. It has pursued patent infringement actions involving a range of competing products in the market, allocating enforcement resources based on the circumstances of each case and prioritizing litigation involving patents covering its core products and technologies.

Across the imaging industry, companies such as DJI and Insta360 have also strengthened their intellectual property strategies in recent years, as original product developers become more willing to defend their rights in court. Where many manufacturers once chose not to take action against copycat products, leading companies now have established procedures for routinely collecting evidence and enforcing their rights. In pursuing infringement claims, rights holders may also seek to recover reasonable enforcement costs, including expenses associated with notarization, legal fees and evidence collection, as they seek compensation for losses tied to their R&D investments.

Intellectual property professionals say the final judgment, which granted all relief sought by the patent holder, reinforces judicial protection of design patent rights.

Companies still face practical challenges in enforcing their patent rights. Seeking preservation measures across multiple design patent cases involves significant procedural hurdles, while lengthy court proceedings and parallel actions add to the overall cost.

To support a healthier market for photography and filmmaking accessories, companies can continue investing in R&D, strengthen their patent portfolios and make effective use of legal remedies to protect their intellectual property. Industry associations and the courts can also work together to improve procedures and support for handling multiple intellectual property cases and reduce the barriers to enforcement. These efforts would promote competition based on original product development rather than low-cost imitation and products that closely replicate existing designs.

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/smallrig-wins-final-ruling-in-side-handle-design-patent-case-against-neewer-302902289.html

Eine anonyme E-Mail an die US-Botschaft in Bern hat kurz vor dem Auftritt von US-Präsident Donald Trump beim Weltwirtschaftsforum in Davos ein Ermittlungsverfahren der Schweizer Bundesanwaltschaft ausgelöst – und zur Festnahme einer WEF-Mitarbeiterin geführt. Inzwischen ist klar: Die gegen die IT-Expertin erhobenen Vorwürfe eines geplanten Attentats waren nicht zu belegen. Die Bundesanwaltschaft teilte mit, die in der Sache eröffneten Ermittlungen wegen strafbarer Vorbereitungshandlungen zu einem Mord seien eingestellt worden.

Die Warnmail war laut Medienberichten der Tamedia-Gruppe wenige Stunden vor Trumps Rede eingegangen. Der anonyme Absender schilderte in fehlerhaftem Englisch eine angeblich „dringliche Bedrohung“ für das Leben des US-Präsidenten in Davos und bezeichnete die später festgenommene Frau iranischer Herkunft als Agentin, die eine entsprechende Operation koordiniert habe. Die US-Botschaft leitete den Hinweis an die Schweizer Behörden weiter; diese erklärten, sie hätten die Warnung „sehr ernst“ genommen und seien „sofort aktiv“ geworden.

Tatsächlich arbeitete die Beschuldigte nicht am Tagungsort in Davos, sondern in der WEF-Zentrale im Genfer Vorort Cologny. Dort wurde sie nach Angaben der Bundesanwaltschaft festgenommen, mehrere Stunden lang bis tief in die Nacht vernommen und ihre Telefone sowie ihr Computer wurden beschlagnahmt und ausgewertet. Im Zuge dieser Maßnahmen habe sich jedoch gezeigt, dass sich keiner der in der anonymen E-Mail erhobenen Punkte erhärten ließ. Für alle Aspekte der Anschuldigungen seien keine Beweise gefunden worden, hieß es zur Begründung für die Einstellung des Verfahrens.

Die betroffene Mitarbeiterin, eine gebürtige Iranerin, war nach den Medienberichten kurz nach dem Vorfall beim WEF nicht mehr beschäftigt. Zu den Gründen äußerte sich die Organisation nicht; auf entsprechende Anfragen gab es zunächst keine Stellungnahme. Damit bleiben nach dem spektakulären Fehlalarm vorerst Fragen offen – etwa zur Herkunft und Glaubwürdigkeit des anonymen Hinweises –, während die Schweizer Strafverfolger den Fall strafrechtlich abgeschlossen haben.